<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Whatever Wednesday: Amy Winehouse, Marquita Pring and L&#8217;oreal Controversies &#038; more	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/2011/07/whatever-wednesday-amy-winehouse-remi-rebillard-marquita-pring-padding-loreal-banned-ads-rancic-tomford-gucci.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/2011/07/whatever-wednesday-amy-winehouse-remi-rebillard-marquita-pring-padding-loreal-banned-ads-rancic-tomford-gucci.html</link>
	<description>fashion. photography. life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:39:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.3.2</generator>
			<item>
				<title>
				By: GRIT &#38; GLAMOUR				</title>
				<link>http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/2011/07/whatever-wednesday-amy-winehouse-remi-rebillard-marquita-pring-padding-loreal-banned-ads-rancic-tomford-gucci.html/comment-page-1#comment-5758</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GRIT &#38; GLAMOUR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/?p=2561#comment-5758</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the mention, B!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention, B!<br />Tweet Me:gritandglamour</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Jamillah				</title>
				<link>http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/2011/07/whatever-wednesday-amy-winehouse-remi-rebillard-marquita-pring-padding-loreal-banned-ads-rancic-tomford-gucci.html/comment-page-1#comment-5656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamillah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 03:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/?p=2561#comment-5656</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m going to read that interview with Marquita right this instant that is fascinating!! I honestly don&#039;t really have a problem with the padding situation. A model really is more than her body, it&#039;s her image, her ability of coming to life ect. 

I am ecstatic about the L&#039;Oreal ads...honestly I&#039;ve worked in advertising for years now and the UK ad guidelines are notoriously really really liberal in their substantiation claims from UK produced advertising are often taken completely out b/c the support is so flimsy. So I&#039;m actually really happy about the ads being taken down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to read that interview with Marquita right this instant that is fascinating!! I honestly don&#8217;t really have a problem with the padding situation. A model really is more than her body, it&#8217;s her image, her ability of coming to life ect. </p>
<p>I am ecstatic about the L&#8217;Oreal ads&#8230;honestly I&#8217;ve worked in advertising for years now and the UK ad guidelines are notoriously really really liberal in their substantiation claims from UK produced advertising are often taken completely out b/c the support is so flimsy. So I&#8217;m actually really happy about the ads being taken down.<br />Tweet Me:made2travel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Jenmarie				</title>
				<link>http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/2011/07/whatever-wednesday-amy-winehouse-remi-rebillard-marquita-pring-padding-loreal-banned-ads-rancic-tomford-gucci.html/comment-page-1#comment-5611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenmarie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/?p=2561#comment-5611</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never heard of someone using padding to add more curves. It&#039;s really just like the models who wear certain bras to make themselves look bigger, or as Steph mentioned photoshopping to make someone look slimmer or bringing their face to perfection. It&#039;s all lies and I don&#039;t think it&#039;s right. The sad thing is a lot of people get sucked into them. Everyone is all about altering, when is it going to be about accepting?

Loved reading through the post!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never heard of someone using padding to add more curves. It&#8217;s really just like the models who wear certain bras to make themselves look bigger, or as Steph mentioned photoshopping to make someone look slimmer or bringing their face to perfection. It&#8217;s all lies and I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s right. The sad thing is a lot of people get sucked into them. Everyone is all about altering, when is it going to be about accepting?</p>
<p>Loved reading through the post!<br />Tweet Me:sheblog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: THE-LOUDMOUTH				</title>
				<link>http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/2011/07/whatever-wednesday-amy-winehouse-remi-rebillard-marquita-pring-padding-loreal-banned-ads-rancic-tomford-gucci.html/comment-page-1#comment-5604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[THE-LOUDMOUTH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/?p=2561#comment-5604</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[The age-old question!  People have told me I should model, and I&#039;m like... I&#039;d either have to gain 40 pounds or lose 40 pounds.  There&#039;s no room for an &quot;average&quot; body.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The age-old question!  People have told me I should model, and I&#8217;m like&#8230; I&#8217;d either have to gain 40 pounds or lose 40 pounds.  There&#8217;s no room for an &#8220;average&#8221; body.<br />Tweet Me:theloudermouth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: THE-LOUDMOUTH				</title>
				<link>http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/2011/07/whatever-wednesday-amy-winehouse-remi-rebillard-marquita-pring-padding-loreal-banned-ads-rancic-tomford-gucci.html/comment-page-1#comment-5603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[THE-LOUDMOUTH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/?p=2561#comment-5603</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Wow!  Lots goin&#039; on here.  Props for putting together such an informative round-up of current happenings...

First off, isn&#039;t the padding thing to make someone seem wider similar to photoshopping someone to making them seem slimmer?  I&#039;m not saying either of those is okay, but I&#039;m not too shocked that the padding is happening.

And the celeb designers... it&#039;s interesting because if they weren&#039;t celebrities, would they even have the desire to design?  Or are they doing it for more self-promotion, to have another project going on?  It doesn&#039;t seem innocent to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  Lots goin&#8217; on here.  Props for putting together such an informative round-up of current happenings&#8230;</p>
<p>First off, isn&#8217;t the padding thing to make someone seem wider similar to photoshopping someone to making them seem slimmer?  I&#8217;m not saying either of those is okay, but I&#8217;m not too shocked that the padding is happening.</p>
<p>And the celeb designers&#8230; it&#8217;s interesting because if they weren&#8217;t celebrities, would they even have the desire to design?  Or are they doing it for more self-promotion, to have another project going on?  It doesn&#8217;t seem innocent to me.<br />Tweet Me:theloudermouth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Megan Joy				</title>
				<link>http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/2011/07/whatever-wednesday-amy-winehouse-remi-rebillard-marquita-pring-padding-loreal-banned-ads-rancic-tomford-gucci.html/comment-page-1#comment-8476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Megan Joy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/?p=2561#comment-8476</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;@BeautifullyInv my heart broke when I saw your http://t.co/kjxFI7C confiscated and slapped on http://t.co/zh9NoPU&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">@BeautifullyInv my heart broke when I saw your <a href="http://t.co/kjxFI7C" rel="nofollow ugc">http://t.co/kjxFI7C</a> confiscated and slapped on <a href="http://t.co/zh9NoPU" rel="nofollow ugc">http://t.co/zh9NoPU</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Marissa				</title>
				<link>http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/2011/07/whatever-wednesday-amy-winehouse-remi-rebillard-marquita-pring-padding-loreal-banned-ads-rancic-tomford-gucci.html/comment-page-1#comment-5598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marissa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/?p=2561#comment-5598</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[The padding trick is just bizzare! Not only could a brand just hire a larger model, but what is wrong with featuring an average-size model?! We see the thinnest of the thin and the curviest of the curvy, but rarely do we see anything in between. How can the fashion industry claim to embrace &quot;real&quot; bodies when we only see two ends of a spectrum?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The padding trick is just bizzare! Not only could a brand just hire a larger model, but what is wrong with featuring an average-size model?! We see the thinnest of the thin and the curviest of the curvy, but rarely do we see anything in between. How can the fashion industry claim to embrace &#8220;real&#8221; bodies when we only see two ends of a spectrum?<br />Tweet Me:WellAppCatwalk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Tamra {walkswithBella}				</title>
				<link>http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/2011/07/whatever-wednesday-amy-winehouse-remi-rebillard-marquita-pring-padding-loreal-banned-ads-rancic-tomford-gucci.html/comment-page-1#comment-5595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tamra {walkswithBella}]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/?p=2561#comment-5595</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the headsup on the Tom Ford interview.  I heart him.  So happy to have discovered your bloggie!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the headsup on the Tom Ford interview.  I heart him.  So happy to have discovered your bloggie!!<br />Tweet Me:walkswithBella</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Rocquelle P.				</title>
				<link>http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/2011/07/whatever-wednesday-amy-winehouse-remi-rebillard-marquita-pring-padding-loreal-banned-ads-rancic-tomford-gucci.html/comment-page-1#comment-8477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocquelle P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/?p=2561#comment-8477</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Must read --&#062;&#062; “@BeautifullyInv: Latest on the blog: Amy Winehouse, Marquita Pring and L’oreal Controversies &#038; more http://t.co/OggUZBR”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Must read &#8211;&gt;&gt; “@BeautifullyInv: Latest on the blog: Amy Winehouse, Marquita Pring and L’oreal Controversies &amp; more <a href="http://t.co/OggUZBR”" rel="nofollow ugc">http://t.co/OggUZBR”</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Madison				</title>
				<link>http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/2011/07/whatever-wednesday-amy-winehouse-remi-rebillard-marquita-pring-padding-loreal-banned-ads-rancic-tomford-gucci.html/comment-page-1#comment-8478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beautifully-invisible.com/?p=2561#comment-8478</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Add to the reading list: via @BeautifullyInv:  Amy Winehouse, Marquita Pring and L’oreal Controversies &#038; more http://t.co/iukEM1u&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Add to the reading list: via @BeautifullyInv:  Amy Winehouse, Marquita Pring and L’oreal Controversies &amp; more <a href="http://t.co/iukEM1u" rel="nofollow ugc">http://t.co/iukEM1u</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
